Thank you, guys! Your comments motivate me to do nos. 5 and 6 of that cycle. But I haven't begun these yet so it'll take some time.
Yes, same opinion, you did a really good job, sounds note-perfect to me.
Almost, yes. After all, it's rather an easy piece, maybe aside from that bar 9 with those thirds, which I found tricky at the beginning. Only the repetition of the forte part is quite sloppy, but I think it's okay.
Could however imagine a little more lively interpretation, it could sounds a bit (only a tiny bit however!) more fluently to me (not necessarily faster). The loud climax I like very much, maybe the end (ppp, perdendosi ...) could come even softer, but I know how difficult that is. Just personal opinion, as this is always the case with interpretations.
Yes, I agree. In retrospective, I think the tempo is a bit too slow, the recording should be 5-8 secs shorter. On the other hand, this piece is often played much too fast being an "Allegro moderato". My Schott edition says 92 per quarter note and I found a recording on the net that is really that fast.
This gives the piece a presto or vivace feel, which can't be intended, imho.
Edit: @ Robert
Forgot to say, it's nice to hear that the recording quality is good. I think I can stick with it for now.