Piano Society
Free Classical Keyboard Recordings
It is currently Thu Dec 18, 2014 2:25 pm

All times are UTC - 1 hour




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Schumann: Romance in F#
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:26 pm
Posts: 829
Location: Miami, Florida, USA
Schumann: Romance in F#, Op. 28, No.2

A beautiful work, but more difficult for me to play than it should be. It takes a lot of control and concentration for a spastic chap like me to play it. When I listen, I always say things like, "That note was too loud." "Why didn't I take more time on that phrase?" "Geeze! Why'd I do that?" etc. ad infin.
Comments welcome!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 8542
That was so nice. I listened with my eyes close since I didn't have the score, and also have never played this. You played the beginning and end pretty sections very gently and controlled the tone well. I'm going to have to listen to this piece again, as I think it may already be working its way onto my 'list of pieces to play someday'.

btw. Your piano sounded fine to me today. I also had mine tuned within a two month time-frame. Made my piano tuner happy but at the same time he wondered why I had called him as it wasn't that bad off. Oh well.

And I know what you mean about listening back to yourself. It's worse though (for me anyway) when I listen to something I recorded a while ago. I usually hate it and wish I could re-record everything.

_________________
"Simplicity is the highest goal, achievable when you have overcome all difficulties." ~ Frederic Chopin

my videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/monicapiano
my personal website: http://www.monicaalianello.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Schumann: Romance in F#
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:42 pm 
[quote="John Robson"]Schumann: Romance in F#, Op. 28, No.2


Go John with the other two romances of this opus!

All best,
Sandro.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:48 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 6:27 pm
Posts: 1842
Location: Sweden
Very romantic played and you have a soft tone that fits very well to the composition. You choose a tempo which is significantly slower than I am used to hear and it would be interesting to hear your idea about that. In this tempo, the similarities to Beethoven's first movement of Op.27 no.2 is getting more obvious.

Schumann composed his three romances of Op.28 in 1839. One year before he married Clara Wieck and even though these works bears no dedication, one cannot help believe that he had Clara in mind when he composed his romances. Clara's father was against the marriage at first as he considered Clara be too young and Robert's career too vague but at the time of composition of these three works, Clara and Robert had made there plan how to marry without his permission. Being not among Schumann's more famous works, the set of three romances should not be neglected and are typical works of the time by Robert.

The recording is up on the site.

_________________
Pianist profile of Robert


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 1:19 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:45 am
Posts: 9637
Location: Netherlands
That is beautiful indeed ! A bit slow to my taste but not too much so, once you get into it. This piece is certainly much harder than in sounds, I guess partly because of the key signature and the wide intervals. The only thing to possibly nag about is that some notes seem to be inaudible in the first part. Also, I thought perhaps at this slow tempo, the exposition repeat should better be skipped. But that is debatable of course.
Your piano sounds great again too. Very well done.

_________________
Nothing is always absolutely so -- Sturgeon's law
Chris Breemer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 3:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:56 pm
Posts: 124
Location: Basel
Very beautiful, John! This is a wonderfully poetic piece of music and you serve it very well. To me, the tempo sounded just right, it is like a dream.

_________________
youtube.com/user/pianovirus


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Romance
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 11:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:26 pm
Posts: 829
Location: Miami, Florida, USA
Robert, thanks so much for the information on the Romances. Very interesting.

I have never heard this Romance performed which is one reason I posted it. The tempo is marked Andante with a quarter note = 69 in my edition. That is what I tried to do, but perhaps it was bit slower. Also in my version there is no repeat of the exposition although it is written out. Did that make sense? What I mean is it was no repeat was written. As for inaudible notes...sorry 'bout dat. That's what is so difficult for me in this piece: trying to play it softly enough without having inaudible notes. I didn't quite succeed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Romance
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 12:56 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 11:45 am
Posts: 9637
Location: Netherlands
John Robson wrote:
As for inaudible notes...sorry 'bout dat. That's what is so difficult for me in this piece: trying to play it softly enough without having inaudible notes. I didn't quite succeed.

Ah but you are definitely getting better. I am just extra alert on this because I suffer from the same problem. One or two occurrences per recording is nothing to worry about.

_________________
Nothing is always absolutely so -- Sturgeon's law
Chris Breemer


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 1 hour


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group