|
Not off-track at all, John! These sound pretty good to me from an articulation (touch) standpoint, in particular. The 8th notes in the prelude are well-detached, as they should when trying to imitate a harpsichord because of its inability to sustain long notes, and the triplet 16th notes are legato, as they should be by virtue of being faster notes, so therefore the sound would not be interrupted between them. Some may argue that the 8th notes should have a more sticky/tenuto (less staccato) sound, especially if you take the prelude at a slower tempo. In the fugue, the subject seems to come out with consistent articulation, no matter which voice it is in, which is a good thing. I'm sure you'll get lots of responses here, but if you don't, I'll take another listen while looking at the score, and nitpick at details, if you like. The trill at bar 64 of the fugue, if being adjudicated here in Canada, would be expected to start on the note ABOVE the note you see written (we call this the written note the "principle note" here) so that Bach trills go "note above, then the principle note that he wrote, note above, principle, etc.". And one last thing about the common approach to Bach endings, at least in this country, is that instead of a gradual rit., the practice here is to imitate the crazy overconfident driver who seems he is going to speed on through a red light, but then surprises people by putting on brakes at last minute. So we do not rit. here for Bach, but instead do a dramatic pause/hesitation just before the last note of song.
|